The ideological discourse of Romanticism in the historic prose: historiosophical conception and Christianity

Article Sidebar

PDF (Українська)
Published: черв. 10, 2015
Keywords:
ideology, discourse, romanticism, historic novel, historiosophical, conception, Christianity, religion, worship, context, style

Main Article Content

V. Martsenishko

Abstract

The meaning of historiosophy and religion (Christianity) in the development of the ideological discourse of Romanticism is defined in the article. To this end comparison of the Ukrainian and Polish hystoriosophical concepts of both nations’ history by comparison of Sarmatian and Cossack knight cults with topic characterized to them is made. Causes and conditions of establishment of the Ukrainian and Polish historical knight cults are accented. The typological comparison of the features of both nations’ knight ideals by analysis of appropriate topic is also represented. The author indicates “boundary” character of these cults, its expansion to both nations’ cultures. The important role of the literature in formation of the Ukrainian and Polish national-political ideologies and programs of sociopolitical movements is accented. In addition, the author proposes to base typological analysis of Ukrainian and Polish romanticism in individual cases not upon identical, but upon analogous phenomena (historical cults and topoi). The influence of the Christian Romanticism on formation of Mychailo Starytsky’s and Genrik Senkevich’s hystoriosophical concepts is studied on the material of Starytsky’s trilogy “Bogdan Khmelnytsky” and Senkevich’s novel “With Fire and Sword”. Opposition of faith had become crucial for both writers because in this context native faith had been a religious-denominational and national factor conservation of which and fight for which had been a key pledge of the national self-identity of both nations. The religious factor in Starytsky’s trilogy sounds much stronger than in his other literary works whereas in Senkevich’s novel it is weaker and in the case of creation of the Ukrainian images it’s even veiled.

Article Details

Issue
No. 358 (2015): Вісник Черкаського університету. Серія "Філологічні науки"
Section
Статті

References

Gelner E. Natsiyi ta natsionalizm / E. Gelner. – K.: Takson, 2003. – 330 s.; Smit E. Natsional'na identychnist' / E. Smit. – K., 1994. – 224 s.

Kas'yanov H. Teoriyi natsiyi ta natsionalizmu / H. Kas'yanov. – K., 1999. – 352 s.

Khobsbaum Эryk. Vek Revolyutsyy. Evropa 1789 – 1848 / Эryk Khobsbaum; per. s anhl. L.D. Yakunynoy. – Rostov-na-Donu: Fenyks, 1999. – 480 s.

Dyv. det.: Velykyy A. Relihiya i tserkva – osnovni rushiyi ukrayins'koyi istoriyi / A. Velykyy // Khronika-2000. – 1999. – #31 – 32. – S. 102 – 120;

Kolodnyy A. Ukrayina v yiyi relihiynykh vyyavakh: [monohrafiya] / A. Kolodnyy. – L.: SPOLOM, 2005. – 336 s.

Kosciolek A. Wybrane fragmenty z korespondencji z przyjaciolmi: o ideowych poszukiwaniach Mikolaja Gogola / A. Kosciolek. – Torun: UMK, 2004. – 180 s.

Sverstyuk Ye. Ukrayins'ka literatura i khrystyyans'ka tradytsiya // Sverstyuk Ye. Na svyati nadiyi. Vybrane. – K., 1999ye. – 784 s.

Sulyma V. Bibliya i ukrayins'ka literatura / V. Sulyma. – K., 1998. – 399 s.

Plokhiy S. Nalyvaykova vira: Kozatstvo ta relihiya v rann'omoderniy Ukrayini / Serhiy Plokhiy. – K.: Krytyka, 2005. – 496 s.

Yakovenko N. Roztyatyy svit: kul'tura Ukrayiny-Rusy v peredden' Khmel'nychchyny / N. Yakovenko // Suchasnist'. – 1994. – #10. – S.59 – 70.

Tazbir J. Polskie przedmurze Chrzescijankiej Europy: mity a rzeczywistosc historyczna. – Warszawa, 1987.

Kresin O. Orlyk, Hrabyanka i narodzhennya khozars'koho mifa / Oleksiy Kresin // Moloda natsiya. – 1997. – #6. – S. 181 – 190.

Ukrayins'ka literatura KhVIII st.: Poetychni tvory. Dramatychni tvory. Prozovi tvory; red. kol.: I.O.Dzeverin (holova) ta in.; vstup. st., uporyadk. i prymitky O.V. Myshanycha. – K.: Naukova dumka, 1983. – 693 s. – (Biblioteka ukrayins'koyi literatury).

Plokhiy S. Nalyvaykova vira: Kozatstvo ta relihiya v rann'omoderniy Ukrayini: [monohrafiya] / Serhiy Plokhiy. – K.: Krytyka, 2005. – 496 s.

Fedchenkov V. Dukhovnыy lyk Pol'shy / V. Fedchenkov // Nash sovremennyk. – 2004. – #9. – S. 229 – 242.

Ursyn M. Relyhyozno-polytycheskye ydealы pol'skoho obshchestva. Ocherk. S predyslovyem hrafa L. N. Tolstoho. – Leyptsyh, 1896. – 259 s.

Dashkevych Ya. Shlyakhy podolannya uperedzhen': Pereshkody normalizatsiyi pol's'ko-ukrayins'kykh stosunkiv / Yaroslav Dashkevych // Pol's'ka kul'tura v zhytti Ukrayiny: Istoriya. S'ohodennya: Materialy II Mizhnarodnoyi naukovoyi konferentsiyi. Kyyiv, 6 – 9 lystopada 1997 / Za red. Yu.Vovka. – K., 2000. – S. 23 – 29.

Hehel' H.V.F. Raboty raznykh let: v 2 t / H.V.F. Hehel'. – M.: Mыsl', 1971. – T.2. (Fylosofskoe nasledye). – 630 s.

Moroz L. Tryyednist' yak osnova universalizmu (natsional'ne – zahal'nolyuds'ke – dukhovne) / Larysa Moroz // Slovo i chas. – 2002. – #3. – S.22 – 31.

Varenko V. Vykhovannya khrystyyans'koyi morali na tvorchosti ukrayins'kykh pys'mennykiv (KhIKh – pochatok KhKh st.) / Volodymyr Varenko // Ukrayins'ka literatura v zahal'noosvitniy shkoli. – 2000. – #2. – S.21 – 25.

Zashkil'nyak L. Neoromantyzm u pol's'kiy istoriohrafiyi pochatku KhKh st. (Do pytannya pro sotsial'nu funktsiyu istoriyi) / Leonid Zashkil'nyak// Problemy slov"yanoznavstva. – L'viv, 1993. – Vyp. 45. – S.36 – 43.

Walicki A. Mesjanistyczne koncepcje narodu i swiadomosci narodowej w ideologii polskiego romantyzmu // Napody i historia. – Krakow, 2000. – S.43.

Zashkil'nyak L. Ukrayina mizh Pol'shcheyu y Rosiyeyu: istoriohrafiya ta suspil'na svidomist' / Leonid Zashkil'nyak // Ukrayins'kyy istorychnyy zhurnal. – 2005. – #5. – S.93 – 117.

Zashkil'nyak L. Stosunky mizh ukrayins'kymy i pol's'kymy istorykamy na zlami KhIKh i KhKh stolit' / Leonid Zashkil'nyak // Wielokulturove srodowisko historyczne Lwowa w XIX I XX w. – Rzeszow, 2004. – T.II. –

S.288 – 294.

Antonovych V. Pol'sko-russkye otnoshenyya KhVII v. v sovremennoy pryzme: Po povodu povesty H. Senkevycha “Ohnem y mechem” / Vladymyr Antonovych // Kyevskaya staryna. – 1885. – #5. – S.44 – 78.

Chaykovs'kyy A. Spohady. Lysty. Doslidzhennya: u 3 t. / Andriy Chaykovs'kyy; holov. uporyad. i red. B.Z. Yakymovych; peredmova B.Z. Yakymovych; L'viv. nats. un-t im. Ivana Franka, Nauk. b-ka, NAN Ukrayiny, In-t ukrayinoznav. im. Ivana Kryp"yakevycha. – L., [b. y.], 2002. – T.1. – 512 s.

Polishchuk V. Khudozhnya proza Mykhayla Staryts'koho: [monohrafiya] / Volodymyr Polishchuk. – Cherkasy, Brama, 2003. – S.59, 69, 217;

Baran Ye. Khmel'nychchyna: sproba osmyslyty / Yevhen Baran // Druh chytacha. – 1992. – 15 sichnya. – S.1, 4 – 5;

Valyus E. Vid Zaporizhzhya do Ukrayiny – formuvannya natsional'noyi svidomosti v pol's'kiy ta ukrayins'kiy istorychniy romanistytsi / E. Valyus // “Ukrayins'ka shkola” v literaturi ta kul'turi ukrayins'ko-pol's'koho pohranychchya. Kyyivs'ki polonistychni studiyi. – K., 2005. – T.7. – S.267 – 268.

Senkevych H. Ohnem y mechem; perevod s pol'sk. A. Эppelya y K. Starosel'skoy; posleslovye y prymechanyya B. Stakheeva / Henryk Senkevych: Sobr. sochynenyy: v 9 t. – M.: Khudozhestvennaya lyteratura, 1983. – T.2. – 670 s.