Spatial language as object for interdisciplinary research
Introduction. The article analyzes and summarizes the main concepts in the spatial language study within the interdisciplinary framework for the purpose of obtaining comprehensive characteristics of the spatial language and defining the term of the spatial language. Purpose. It presents an overview of the basic hypotheses for the conceptualization of the spatial cognitive map coding theory and others. The idea of the autonomy of mental processes is present in almost all the hypotheses relevant to space conceptualization. Results. Core spatial concepts are formed on the basis of empirical knowledge acquired by spatial cognition that is universal due to human physiology. Human spatial representation system interacts with conceptual structure and language. So some knowledge of the nature of the spatial representation can be gained by analyzing linguistic representation of space. To determine which spatial concepts become verbalized in language the description of all existing spatial characteristics of objects, all possible spatial relations between them and the spatial relations between objects and pace is given. Originality. Fundamental terms for spatial relations are often based on concepts from small-scale space. Spatial language is the terms that people use to describe different spatial situations. From the linguistic point of view they can belong to different categories, but in conceptual structure they all contain some spatial information, namely the spatial characteristics of objects, the objects location, movement of objects, spatial relations between objects. Conclusion. Considering the theory of intertextuality of idioms we assume that the analysis of the verbalization of spatial concepts by phraseological units can be of a particular interest.
Ultan, R. (1969). Some general characteristics of the interrogative systems. Working Papers on Language Universals, 1, 40 -63
Evans, V., Chilton, P. (2010). Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M. F. (1996) Language and Space. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Vernadsky, V. Y. (1989). Biosphere and Neosphere. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ.)
Karaulov, Yu. N. (2010). Russian Language and Linguistic Identity. Moscow. LKI. (in Russ.)
Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Language and Human World. Moscow: Yazyki russkoj kul`tury. (in Russ.)
Fodor, J. F. (1975). The Language of Thought. NY: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, Inc.
Tolman, E. C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Vol.55, The Psychological Review, 4, 189-208.
O'Keefe, J., Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Cambridge University Press.
The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2014/press.html
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. NY: Praeger Publishers.
Paivio, A. (2006). Dual coding Theory and Education. Draft chapter for the conference on Pathways to Literacy Achievement for High Poverty Children. The University of Michigan School of Education.
Mark, D. M. & Frank, A. U. Concepts of Space and Spatial Language. Proceedings Ninth International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography. Baltimore. 538-556.
Kosslyn, S. M, Koenig, O., Barrett, A., Cave, C., Tang, J., Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance. 15. 723-735.
Abler, R. F. (1987). The National Science Foundation National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Vol. 1. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 4. 303-326.
Freeman, J. (1975). The modelling of spatial relations. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. 4, 156-171.
Mark, D. M., Freksa, Ch., Hirtle, S. C., Lloyd, R., Tversky, B. (1999). Cognitive models of geographical space. Vol. 13. Geographical Information science. 8. 747-774.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kolshansky, G. V. (1990). Objective World View in Cognition and Language. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ.)
- There are currently no refbacks.